Denver Workers' Compensation Lawyer: Mack Babcock

(303) 683-5033 FREE CONSULT 4600 S Ulster St.
Suite 800, Denver CO 80237
  • Our Firm
    • Our Mission
    • Injury Attorney Profiles
    • How Representation Works
  • Practice Areas
    • Workers’ Compensation / Work Injuries
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Drunk Driving Accidents
    • Pedestrian Accidents
    • Injured Truckers and Cab Drivers
    • Slip and Falls (Premises Liability)
    • Insurance Disputes
    • Wrongful Death
  • Reviews
  • News
  • Resources
    • Legal Library
    • Workers’ Compensation Guide
    • Scholarships
  • Locations
  • Contact
Personal Injury Attorneys (Home) › Attorney Blog › Workers' Compensation › Narcotic Use amongst Workers’ Compensation Patients Drastically Differ Across States

Narcotic Use amongst Workers’ Compensation Patients Drastically Differ Across States

August 29, 2014

colourful-pillsA recent study out of the Workers Compensation Research Institute (WCRI) in Cambridge, Mass has found a substantial variation between the high- and low-use states in terms of narcotic use in workers compensation cases. This study involves findings in 25 states.

This study delving into narcotic usage started in 2011.

The states involved in the workers’ compensation data include: Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. Across these 25 states, approximately 264,000 workers’ compensation claims and 1.5 million prescriptions were included.

Among the 25 states studied, Louisiana and New York had the highest rates. In these two states, the average worker was receiving more than 3,600 mg of morphine-equivalent narcotics. This number is equivalent to a worker needing to take a 5-mg of hydrocodone every four hours (continuously) for an entire month—i.e. a 120-mg dose for an entire month. By comparison, Missouri and Iowa had the lowest rate of narcotic use. They averaged a morphine equivalent per claim of roughly 1,000 mg.

That is a huge 2,600 mg difference!

The findings of the study bring to light that high-use states tend to have more workers requiring narcotic usage for pain control. Moreover, these state’s workers require taking opioids for a longer period. While this could point to these states having more workers who are injured on the job, the numbers also raise questions about the screening process for patients; especially screening for psychological and addiction concerns.

Screening for psychological and addiction concerns should be a priority in most cases where opioid medications are involved. This is because even if a person’s medical condition requires the use of opioids for pain management, this class of medication always has a risk of dependence.

Therefore, doctors will want to follow medical treatment guidelines—especially for long-term opioid management—including the use of random drug testing and frequent psychological reevaluations to avoid addition. This is because the most important thing for doctors is to help injured workers recover and return to work quickly.

One belief for higher levels of opioid prescribing is that in some states, more pressure is put on the provider because regulators and hospital staffs expect providers to prescribe narcotic intervention for almost any pain level. Furthermore, the level of prescriptions may depend on the level of enforcement and importance according to providers.

One issue that was discovered over the course of this study is opioid usage for nonsurgical patients. This group of patients, whose prescriptions were for nonspecific back pain, raises a problem as current clinical guidelines suggest that opioids not be prescribed for this use. Moreover, even if opioid usage is appropriate, opioids should be used no longer than 7-14 days—not the month(s) that the study discovered.

While there is no denying that injuries (regardless of where they occur) will require some level of pain medication to speed recovery, being injured on the job can be a difficult time, sometimes requiring intervention to get back to work.

If you’ve been injured on the job and need assistance getting compensation, please schedule a free consultation with Colorado workers’ comp attorney R. Mack Babcock at Babcock Law Firm today, or continue browsing our blog and knowledge center to find other information.

Filed Under: Workers' Compensation Tagged With: Colorado job injury, Colorado workers' compensation laws, Colorado workers' compensation news, work injury benefits

5-star review image
Excellence, Efficiency and Transparaency
Workers Compensation  |  Longmont
Retained for representation following fall from a ladder to address correct calculation of average weekly wage and settlement.
2016-05-08
"Working with Mack was a pleasure. From day one he spent the time (hours) to fully apprise me ..."
TVN, Verified Customer
5-star review image
Outstanding
Workers Compensation  |  Littleton
Retained following a head injury addressing issues regarding medical treatment and referrals. Negotiated a final settlement.
2017-01-22
"The Babcock Law Firm did an outstanding job of representing me. I had never been involved in a ..."
JC, Verified Customer
5-star review image
A big thanks to everyone
Workers Compensation  |  Greeley
Represented truck driver following injury out of state. Reached settlement on two separate claims following extensive medical treatment.
2016-11-11
"Without everyone's help I would have been left out in the cold. I would recommend this Law Firm 2..."
Heath, Verified Customer
Related Articles from our Knowledge Center
Workers Compensation
When You're Injured
  • How to File a Work Injury Claim
  • Reporting a Work-Related Injury or Condition
  • Workers' Compensation Overview
Obtaining Treatment & Benefits
  • Workers’ Compensation for Law Enforcement Officers
  • Reasons Why Temporary Disability Benefits Can Be Terminated in Your Workers’ Compensation Case
  • Workers' Compensation Case Timeline
Work Injury Prevention, General Information
  • How Forced Arbitration Leaves Employees Helpless
  • Combustible Dust: An Explosive Work Hazard
  • 10 Common Workplace Injuries
View All Workers Comp Articles

Blog Categories

  • Auto Accidents
  • Community
  • DUI/DWAI
  • Firm News
  • General
  • Insurance Disputes
  • Personal Injury
  • Premises Liability
  • Preventing Injury
  • Product/Safety Recalls
  • Workers' Compensation
  • Wrongful Death

Personal Injury
Practice Areas

Car Accidents Truck Accidents Motorcycle Accidents Drunk Driving Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Workers' Comp / Work Injuries Injured Truckers / Cab Drivers Slip & Falls (Premises Liability) Insurance Disputes Wrongful Death

Resources

Blog Contact Us Legal Library Workers' Compensation Guide Firm News
Association Badges
Association Badges
(303) 683-5033
The Babcock Law Firm
Denver Workers' Compensation Lawyer and Personal Injury Attorney Mack Babcock
4600 S Ulster Street, Suite 800 Denver, CO 80237 United States

Personal injury
practice areas

  • Car Accidents
  • Truck Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Drunk Driving Accidents
  • Pedestrian Accidents
  • Workers' Comp / Work Injuries
  • Injured Truckers / Cab Drivers
  • Slip & Falls (Premises Liability)
  • Insurance Disputes
  • Wrongful Death

Resources

  • Blog
  • Legal Library
  • Workers' Compensation Guide
  • Firm News

Free eBooks

  • Colorado Workers' Comp Guide
  • Colorado Car Accident Guide

Our firm

  • Firm Mission
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Contact
  • Knowledge Center

    Facebook    Twitter    Blog

More
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer & Terms of Use
  • Local & Reviews
© The Babcock Law Firm. Colorado law firm for workers' compensation, car accidents & personal injury. Serving all of Colorado and the Denver metro area from our Denver law office law firm internet marketing by SEO Advantage®